01Standard
Written before spoken
If a decision only exists in a call, it does not exist. Objectives, faculty, budget bands and approval routes go into one living document the day they are agreed.
Our approach
Fivestandardswecanbeheldto.
Not a philosophy page. These are the working rules we put in writing at the start of every engagement — and the trade-offs that come with them.
Operating standards
Therules,inorderofhowoftentheysaveaprogramme
- 02Standard
One owner per date
Every date in the plan carries a single name — ours or yours. Shared ownership is how deadlines quietly become nobody's.
- 03Standard
Compliance drafted in
Transfer-of-value records, contracts and consent are built while the programme is being designed, not reconstructed for an audit afterwards.
- 04Standard
Faculty treated as peers
Clinicians are briefed with the actual scientific question, given time to prepare, and never asked to endorse a conclusion they did not reach.
- 05Standard
No silent weeks
A short written status lands every week, whether or not there is news. Silence is treated as a defect, not a sign that things are fine.
Ownership
Who holds what, agreed before week one
- Scientific objective and internal sign-off
- YOUR TEAM
- Agenda, content architecture, drafting
- ALIMETRIC
- Faculty relationships and invitations
- ALIMETRIC, IN YOUR NAME
- Regulatory and legal approval
- YOUR TEAM
- Logistics, vendors, budget tracking
- ALIMETRIC
- Final word on message and data
- YOUR TEAM
Trade-offs
Whatthiswayofworkingcostsyou
We slow down week one
The brief takes longer than most agencies spend on it. It is the only reason weeks four to ten stay quiet.
We push back on scope creep
A programme that grows mid-flight loses its scientific spine. We will propose a phase two instead.
We won't chase volume
A limited number of live programmes at a time, because the detail is the service.
If any of these standards would be a problem inside your organisation, it's worth a conversation before a proposal.
Start a conversation